About Me

Name: Rick Marschall
Email: AmericaCiv@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

The United Hates of America

    

The United Hates of America

By Rick Marschall

A distinguishing characteristic of the 2008 election, but also of the American culture in general, is the relative importance of the peripheral. I am reminded, for instance, of Katie Couric putting matters in perspective – at least her perspective – when she announced the death of Mother Teresa: “We just got word that Mother Teresa, who once met Princess Diana, has passed away…” Yes, it was during the week of Diana’s fatal accident; yes, many news readers never develop improvisational skills. But she could have focused the curious connection in the other direction, or simply not stretched for a connection.

Yet it was an emblem of America’s obsession with celebrity, and, I said, our elevation of the peripheral over the substantive. “Trivia” now seems like the stuff of doctoral theses compared to the stories that flit across front pages, TV-crawls, and computer screens for flickering moments.

In this campaign one of the topics that has shoved aside discussions of, say, foreign policy or judicial activism, is Sarah Palin‘s medical transcript.

She has not provided it to hungry journalists, particularly the watchdog of public affairs, Kate Snow of ABC News (about whom more anon). Neither has Obama, although his campaign released a one-page summary of his health, scarcely the same thing. For that matter, he has stonewalled on the release of his birth certificate in the face of questions about his parentage and the location of his birth, a Constitutional matter (his campaign has released an after-the-fact “record of live birth,” a different document); neither has he yielded to intense curiosity about college transcripts or theses he wrote at Columbia and Harvard, in the face of suspicions of early fealty to Marxist doctrine.

In the interest of full – or partial – disclosure, Biden has released his medical records… with redactions of details about recent brain scans! As someone who has been treated for dangerous brain aneurysms in the past, he should want to reassure the public.

So Sarah Palin has not released her medical records either. It’s not irrelevant matter with any of the candidates, and she has indicated that she would do so; therefore soon rather than late would be appropriate.

But let us pause for a moment on the real story, which is not blood pressure but political pressure. Kate Snow has been an embedded with the Hillary Clinton campaign and a weekend anchor for ABC News. Her puffball questions of Hillary are textbook examples of favorable bias. An “exclusive” interview with Bill Clinton included a question about his arguments in the primary campaign that began “You might not want to answer this, and I’ll respect that…”. Her Democrat bias lends credence to the new nickname of ABC – Another Barack Channel – and her shameful imbalance explains why the mainstream media is losing audience at warp-speed.

In the ABC News “Political Radar” blog for November 1, she writes of the fact that Palin has not yielded to Snow’s request: “Of course there are plenty of perfectly innocent explanations. The governor is perfectly healthy and the campaign feels no public pressure to release information? The doctor is on vacation and unreachable?  The dog ate their records? There are also more sinister explanations. But we won't go there.”

Say it ain’t Snow, Kate. By “not going there,” you HAVE gone there. One place you HAVEN’T gone is Journalism 101. A columnist or commentator properly might write “sinister explanations.” A reporter or anchor should write, “troubling possibilities,” or even “suspicions raised.”  But to write “…more sinister explanations. But we won't go there” confirms that she is taking money under false pretenses from ABC “News,” and ought to wear an Obama button on the set.

But I promised we’d discuss the “United Hates of America.” This Snow job is not it – but her words clearly invite the opening of floodgates of bile it is hard to comprehend. The blog response from Internet readers cascaded. Snow poster her brief countdown of disappointment at 2:22 p.m. I read hundreds and hundreds of posting from readers… so you don’t have to. If you insist on opening the link, I warn you – if you are civil and have good sense or good taste – this will be somewhere between offensive and depressing. Here is the link: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/11/day-six-and-sti.html

Before my summary, remember, we are talking about a sitting governor, the vice-presidential candidate of a major party, a wife and mother, a church member and committed Christian… well, before I get the REAL reasons for the venomous attacks, here is a summary:

Just on the day of Snow’s blog posting, there were reader’s “comments” that can be categorized:

Palin obviously is hiding something “sinister” (Kiss me, Kate): 25 references

Palin clearly is lying: 21

Medical records would show that her husband Todd abused her: 5

Palin is a drug addict: 11

Palin pretended to have the newborn Trig, covering for her daughter Bristol: 97

Palin has had one or more abortions: 55

Palin is mentally unstable and takes treatment drugs: 31

Palin has a STD; herpes or syphilis: 26

I hesitate to list other discussion-points from the democratic chit-chat, but in case your outrage has not been stoked, writers allege that Sarah Palin is a rape victim; is an alcoholic; needs the companionship of a female aide from Alaska; was born male; had sex with McCain; and that her medical records would show that she doesn’t breast-feed, as if that’s a crime.

Once upon a time public servants had to fear only assassin’s bullets.

Michael Barone, longtime staffer on US News and World Report and the editor of the respected Almanac of American Politics, recently wrote an essay, “The Coming Obama Thugocracy.” He properly warns that we are entering an era of intimidation, perversion of laws for partisan ends, and the suppression of free speech.

The posts on this ABC blog of Snow’s are but hors d’oeuvre to the main meal. “Oh, these are just hot-heads letting off steam; that’s what the wide-open Internet is all about.”

This is not about idiots; we have always had them. It is about the subversion of “independent” “news” “services,” for without their objectivity we are doomed as a culture.

This is not about a minimal screening of lewd and obscene posts on a corporate web site, because we long ago abandoned such expectations of the mainstream media.

It is not only about the injustice being done to a decent woman and her family. Be prepared the vilest things said about her husband and daughters – including “dangling the retard in front of screaming audiences” and “Trig probably wished he had been aborted” when he was dressed in a Halloween costume, on other blogs.

What should concern us – deeply, deeply, deeply – is the death of civility in American culture. Good Will left the house a while ago, but arrogance, coarseness, and intimidation are the thugs who have moved in. This is new Ruling Elite.

Get ready for, possibly, four years or eight years of this. Or maybe our entire future, until we are formally overtaken. The barbarians are at the gates. They are also scaling the gates, worming into the foundations, pouring through the cracks.

– 30 – 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Being a Character vs Having Character

 
Being a Character vs Having Character

By Rick Marschall

Each in his or her way, we have four “characters” running at the top of the tickets this year. In accepted usage, each has singular, perhaps, idiosyncratic, traits. The stuff of potential greatness – as historian Doris Kearns Goodwin has said about McCain – and the stuff of potential disaster, as, well, political savants like Joy Behar and Paris Hilton say about McCain.

Supporters have the blindest eyes of all, so our national “characters” can be nobility or buffoonery. Biden’s “gaffes,” for instance, about who was president when the Great Depression hit; about FDR speaking on television before it was in commercial use; about his running mate’s definition of Middle Class; about asking a man in a wheelchair to stand up; about his position as chair of a Senate Foreign Relations committee giving him “guaranteed” information of an impending national crisis; about Obama’s readiness to be Commander-in-Chief; about his missing brain-scan data on health-disclosure forms; about stealing anecdotes from a British Labor leader’s biography and claiming they were his own family experiences; about misstating the circumstances of his wife’s death in contradiction to the police report… these are all ignored by the media or laughed off by supporters as “oh, that’s good old Joe.” But if Sarah Palin were to commit any of these, they would not be “gaffes” or mistakes but lies and imbecility.

The press corps is a bunch of characters too, eh?

But on the question of CHARACTER – an inner guiding core; not what factors make you a media “personality” – it is profitable briefly to compare McCain and Obama.

McCain served in the military; Obama did not. Neither factor is an automatic marker of character. McCain was shot down and was a prisoner of war for five years. Hardly anyone can relate to such experiences, much less be judged against them. Everyone should agree that being shot down does not qualify one to be president; being a prisoner of war brings no special insight to a statesman or diplomat.

McCain admits to adultery and episodes of carousing and drinking. He is especially ashamed of his divorce and, later as senator, errors in judgment when dealing with a savings-and-loan figure. Obama has admitted to drug use. By all evidence his family life is blameless. McCain’s Christian faith had led him to repent of the sins he committed, and in politics and private life clearly is charted by the compass of forgiveness.

This review has been somewhat more detailed about McCain, not so much because he is older, but because there are so many holes, blank periods, in Obama’s resume.

There is controversy about his real father, and his place of birth. He has refused to release his actual birth certificate.

There are questions about what he did, what he wrote for his degrees for instance, at Occidental and Columbia. He has kept all college records and these papers from being released.

There is a video tape of his hosting a celebration of a prominent Palestinian radical, where Weatherman terrorist William Ayres and other “activists” were present. He has stonewalled efforts to release that tape, and refused questions from the few journalists who have inquired.

He has been famously quiet – and famously is clad in Teflon – about Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, “Tony” Rezko, Father Fleger, the Communist Frank Marshall Davis (“my mentor”), the Muslim radical Khalidi, and others. Can Obama be appraised when he offers so few facts?

A comparison will serve.

McCain, as a prisoner of war, was tortured. Many bones were broken, by strikes or slow pressure. He was tortured. He was in solitary confinement for years. He endured, he broke down, he suffered in silence.

Obama doesn’t need a similar experience to present us a with a character assessment. McCain was offered release as a propaganda “show” – his father was a prominent admiral – but he refused to leave before his buddies in the prison camp who were there longer than he; and he was tortured more severely for that decision.

Consider Obama and HIS buddies: Ayres and his girlfriend Bernadine Dohrn bombed the Capitol building, the Pentagon, and police stations while McCain was being tortured in Viet Nam. Dubious stars of the FBI’s Most Wanted list, they hid like rats for years and then escaped prosecution because the government botched evidence – evidence that Ayres has not disputed, and, indeed, remains proud of.

Obama first denied knowing of Ayres’ past, then denied knowing him well, then – confronted with the truth – claimed that his own age at time of Ayres’ crimes, 8, freed him from the hideous appearance of consorting with an unrepentant terrorist.

So he didn’t quite throw Ayres under the bus because he clung to a false portrait for his career’s sake. That’s one way to deal with a buddy.

His treatment of Jeremiah Wright, frothy racist in ministerial dashikis, is a better barometer of his treatment of friends. Intimate member of the family, officiating at Barry and Michelle’s wedding, the spiritual guide for 20 years, when his hate-filled messages were broadly made public, Wright saw his “friend” first deny knowing the citywide notorious views, then eloquently assert his inability to deny Wright as a friend… and finally to see Obama bail on the church and toss the “reverend” under the bus.

There are other examples, all of the same pattern: resumes hidden; resumes padded. Friends denied; friends abandoned. Mocking working people and their values in private meetings caught on tape; pandering to them in orchestrated and choreographed public spectacles. Exercising “community organizing” – the Marxist program developed by Saul Alinsky – and Marxist economics but portraying them as Norman Rockwell confections. All for the sake of a career and ambition.

Remember, the other choice in this campaign is someone who endured torture and humiliation for friends similarly treated in cells next to him. He knew them, and he wouldn’t betray them. John McCain also endured all that for friends he DIDN’T know – the people back home. Will they stick with him?

There are many ways to assess “character.” Judging a man by the company he keeps is one of the oldest, and truest, ways.

– 30 – 

Rick Marschall has been called by Bostonia Magazine "perhaps America's foremost authority on popular culture.” He is the Managing Editor of Rare Jewel Magazine, the Christian journal of politics and culture; and founding and Contributing Editor of Hogan's Alley, Journal of the Cartoon Arts. The author/editor of 62 books, he has been a political cartoonist, columnist, syndicate editor, publisher, and lecturer. His wide experience includes Editor at Marvel Comics, writer for Disney Comics, consultant to the US Postal Service, and lecturer for the US Information Service of the State Department. He has been on the faculties of the School of Visual Arts, Rutgers University, Philadelphia College of Art (now University of the Arts), and the Summer Institute for the Gifted at Bryn Mawr University. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »