About Me

Name: Rick Marschall
Email: AmericaCiv@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Say It Ain't So, Barack

Say It Ain’t So, Barack
 
by Rick Marschall

Four days to go. Do you find yourself watching your candidate on TV and saying. “I wish he had said that in the debates!” or “Why couldn’t he have displayed that intensity three months ago”? Candidates and their supporters are finally saying some things “better late than never.”

And some are saying things about saying things that maybe they shouldn’t be saying. Or maybe it’s good they ARE saying certain things; that is, maybe we’re hearing things just in time.

On Halloween – appropriately – Barack Obama figuratively jumped out from behind a bush (no pun intended) and yelled Boo to voters. In Columbia, Missouri, he warned that the last four days of the campaign would be filled with hate, fear, and threats… from the Republicans. Just like they’ve been doing all along, he said. There would be attempts to keep voters from the polls… by the Republicans. (Big jokes from little ACORNS grow.) So forth and so on… but, understand, Obama will be there to protect us.

But saying these things do not make them true; or, to the real extent that all politics has become dirty, to tip O’Neill on his head, Obama’s portrayal of his campaign, the dirtiest in history, as the most innocent and cleanest will not make it so.

But with herd-instinct voters in the Media Age, you CAN put a Halloween mask on a pig and scare people.

One of the despicable tactics of the Obama campaign has been to play the race card. Actually, the campaign has dealt the race DECK. Did you notice that the outrageous racism of “Reverend” Wright, aired so early in the campaign, effectively erased a depiction of Obama himself as a Black Radical?

Then Obama said in many speeches that “they” (Republicans and conservatives) will tell “you” (susceptible voters) that “he” (Obama), “he’s different, he has a funny name, he… looks different.” Which is the same thing as accusing his opponents of stopping just short of the N-word and organizing lynching bees.

Notice that in this long campaign, Hillary and McCain were accused of being bigots, but the only SAYING of racist words were by people like Obama and Wright; the only bigoted words SAID were by Obama and his surrogates.

In the third presidential debate, a similar Big Lie was attempted. Obama claimed that at Sarah Palin appearances angry crowds were yelling, “Kill him!” at the mention of Obama’s name. But the Secret Service, a constant presence with the campaigns, denied they ever witnessed such a thing. The FBI investigated; the same thing – no evidence. No crowd members or reporters, even that reliably hostile press entourage, could attest to a single such imprecation.

But – having raised his libel from McCain as an individual to voters in general – Obama’s “saying” such trashy fabrications had the usual, slick success.

The latest bit of scabrous-saying from Obama surrogates and supporters comes from a doyen of American letters, the feminist icon Erica Jong. In Rome at the moment, she was interviewed by the newspaper Coriere della Serra on October 29.

Stick with my translation (the entire interview is here: << http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2008/ottobre/29/Follett_Jane_Fonda_liberal_americani_co_9_081029030.shtml >> ) but here is what a Pulitzer Prize winning author, an oft-displayed supporter of Obama, said:

… liberal Americans have anxiety about Obama.” The article quotes her feeling that there will civil war in the US if Obama were to lose. “There are voting booths that cast your vote for McCain when you pull the Obama lever.… the Republicans have already perpetrated swindles.”

She continued: “…my generation has seen, first-person, the murders of JFK, his brother Robert, Martin Luther King. Squads, armed with Kalashnikovs [machine guns] will also kill the Obama Dream.”

She asserts she is not alone in such assurances: writer “Naomi Wolf calls me every day in order to see if my mood is any blacker. Yesterday Jane Fonda sent me an e-mail” about her stress and back pains caused by anxiety of what will happen in the wake of an Obama loss. “My back also spasms a lot,” Jong said, “making me take Valium. This is what they [the Republicans] have caused….”

She claims “if Obama loses, the second American civil war will erupt. There will be the blood in the streets, believe me. … Bush has recalled from Iraq a contingent of soldiers who under the command of Dick Cheney will be employed in the streets against American citizens.”

The Italian reporter calls Jong’s analysis “apocalyptic.” But the American authoress continued: “Jewish intellectuals like me are not astonished, after eight years of Bush, as Naomi Wolf wrote in ‘The End of America,’ because the United States has been transformed into a police state -- from the torture of… journalists to the Patriot Act.”

So say Obama surrogates among the intelligentsia and overseas (is it any wonder that polls say Obama would carry European electorates?) Does Obama ever distance himself from such lunacy? Of course not. In his semantic paradigm, rather an existential exercise, you see, saying such things makes them perforce true. His absurd claims to ignorance of Jeremiah Wright’s racism and treasonous charges neutralized their significance. What Americans should be asking is” “Even if you never knew this guy whom you quoted for your autobiography’s title, why weren’t you outraged when you DID learn about it?”

Finally, let’s consider the threats made by Obama supporters like the celebrated writer Erica Jong. If her candidate loses, there will be civil war, blood in the streets. Indeed we have heard about big-city police departments, and inner-city officials, already scheduling extra security on the streets for election night.

What Erica Jong said, oh my. I have to disagree. I don’t think there will be rioting in the streets if Obama loses. You see, she says it as a threat (besides, if she incites to riot she will be safe in Rome or Israel or Beverly Hills).

What I foresee – and I pray and I keep hope alive that I am wrong – is that if Obama loses, the inner cities will riot. If Obama wins, the inner cities will riot. This happens when basketball teams lose and win; why not this presidential candidate?

This is what democracy in America has come to: lies, threats, and dangerous nonsense. Say it ain’t so.

– 30 – 

Rick Marschall has been called by Bostonia Magazine "perhaps America's foremost authority on popular culture.” He is the Managing Editor of Rare Jewel Magazine, the Christian journal of politics and culture; and founding and Contributing Editor of Hogan's Alley, Journal of the Cartoon Arts. The author/editor of 62 books, he has been a political cartoonist, columnist, syndicate editor, publisher, and lecturer. His wide experience includes Editor at Marvel Comics, writer for Disney Comics, consultant to the US Postal Service, and lecturer for the US Information Service of the State Department. He has been on the faculties of the School of Visual Arts, Rutgers University, Philadelphia College of Art (now University of the Arts), and the Summer Institute for the Gifted at Bryn Mawr University. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Being a Character vs Having Character

 
Being a Character vs Having Character

By Rick Marschall

Each in his or her way, we have four “characters” running at the top of the tickets this year. In accepted usage, each has singular, perhaps, idiosyncratic, traits. The stuff of potential greatness – as historian Doris Kearns Goodwin has said about McCain – and the stuff of potential disaster, as, well, political savants like Joy Behar and Paris Hilton say about McCain.

Supporters have the blindest eyes of all, so our national “characters” can be nobility or buffoonery. Biden’s “gaffes,” for instance, about who was president when the Great Depression hit; about FDR speaking on television before it was in commercial use; about his running mate’s definition of Middle Class; about asking a man in a wheelchair to stand up; about his position as chair of a Senate Foreign Relations committee giving him “guaranteed” information of an impending national crisis; about Obama’s readiness to be Commander-in-Chief; about his missing brain-scan data on health-disclosure forms; about stealing anecdotes from a British Labor leader’s biography and claiming they were his own family experiences; about misstating the circumstances of his wife’s death in contradiction to the police report… these are all ignored by the media or laughed off by supporters as “oh, that’s good old Joe.” But if Sarah Palin were to commit any of these, they would not be “gaffes” or mistakes but lies and imbecility.

The press corps is a bunch of characters too, eh?

But on the question of CHARACTER – an inner guiding core; not what factors make you a media “personality” – it is profitable briefly to compare McCain and Obama.

McCain served in the military; Obama did not. Neither factor is an automatic marker of character. McCain was shot down and was a prisoner of war for five years. Hardly anyone can relate to such experiences, much less be judged against them. Everyone should agree that being shot down does not qualify one to be president; being a prisoner of war brings no special insight to a statesman or diplomat.

McCain admits to adultery and episodes of carousing and drinking. He is especially ashamed of his divorce and, later as senator, errors in judgment when dealing with a savings-and-loan figure. Obama has admitted to drug use. By all evidence his family life is blameless. McCain’s Christian faith had led him to repent of the sins he committed, and in politics and private life clearly is charted by the compass of forgiveness.

This review has been somewhat more detailed about McCain, not so much because he is older, but because there are so many holes, blank periods, in Obama’s resume.

There is controversy about his real father, and his place of birth. He has refused to release his actual birth certificate.

There are questions about what he did, what he wrote for his degrees for instance, at Occidental and Columbia. He has kept all college records and these papers from being released.

There is a video tape of his hosting a celebration of a prominent Palestinian radical, where Weatherman terrorist William Ayres and other “activists” were present. He has stonewalled efforts to release that tape, and refused questions from the few journalists who have inquired.

He has been famously quiet – and famously is clad in Teflon – about Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, “Tony” Rezko, Father Fleger, the Communist Frank Marshall Davis (“my mentor”), the Muslim radical Khalidi, and others. Can Obama be appraised when he offers so few facts?

A comparison will serve.

McCain, as a prisoner of war, was tortured. Many bones were broken, by strikes or slow pressure. He was tortured. He was in solitary confinement for years. He endured, he broke down, he suffered in silence.

Obama doesn’t need a similar experience to present us a with a character assessment. McCain was offered release as a propaganda “show” – his father was a prominent admiral – but he refused to leave before his buddies in the prison camp who were there longer than he; and he was tortured more severely for that decision.

Consider Obama and HIS buddies: Ayres and his girlfriend Bernadine Dohrn bombed the Capitol building, the Pentagon, and police stations while McCain was being tortured in Viet Nam. Dubious stars of the FBI’s Most Wanted list, they hid like rats for years and then escaped prosecution because the government botched evidence – evidence that Ayres has not disputed, and, indeed, remains proud of.

Obama first denied knowing of Ayres’ past, then denied knowing him well, then – confronted with the truth – claimed that his own age at time of Ayres’ crimes, 8, freed him from the hideous appearance of consorting with an unrepentant terrorist.

So he didn’t quite throw Ayres under the bus because he clung to a false portrait for his career’s sake. That’s one way to deal with a buddy.

His treatment of Jeremiah Wright, frothy racist in ministerial dashikis, is a better barometer of his treatment of friends. Intimate member of the family, officiating at Barry and Michelle’s wedding, the spiritual guide for 20 years, when his hate-filled messages were broadly made public, Wright saw his “friend” first deny knowing the citywide notorious views, then eloquently assert his inability to deny Wright as a friend… and finally to see Obama bail on the church and toss the “reverend” under the bus.

There are other examples, all of the same pattern: resumes hidden; resumes padded. Friends denied; friends abandoned. Mocking working people and their values in private meetings caught on tape; pandering to them in orchestrated and choreographed public spectacles. Exercising “community organizing” – the Marxist program developed by Saul Alinsky – and Marxist economics but portraying them as Norman Rockwell confections. All for the sake of a career and ambition.

Remember, the other choice in this campaign is someone who endured torture and humiliation for friends similarly treated in cells next to him. He knew them, and he wouldn’t betray them. John McCain also endured all that for friends he DIDN’T know – the people back home. Will they stick with him?

There are many ways to assess “character.” Judging a man by the company he keeps is one of the oldest, and truest, ways.

– 30 – 

Rick Marschall has been called by Bostonia Magazine "perhaps America's foremost authority on popular culture.” He is the Managing Editor of Rare Jewel Magazine, the Christian journal of politics and culture; and founding and Contributing Editor of Hogan's Alley, Journal of the Cartoon Arts. The author/editor of 62 books, he has been a political cartoonist, columnist, syndicate editor, publisher, and lecturer. His wide experience includes Editor at Marvel Comics, writer for Disney Comics, consultant to the US Postal Service, and lecturer for the US Information Service of the State Department. He has been on the faculties of the School of Visual Arts, Rutgers University, Philadelphia College of Art (now University of the Arts), and the Summer Institute for the Gifted at Bryn Mawr University. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »